Le samedi 9 août 2025 à 8:55 AM, Marek Paśnikowski <[email protected]> 
a écrit :

> 

> 

> Good morning.
> 


Hi,

> I reviewed the package module and while I did find an issue, that issue was 
> unrelated to your problem.
> 

> > I use the guix commit : guix time-machine -C channels.scm 
> > --commit=823010478c4253f32c0b4d979881dbc6d7d08179 -- build -v 3 
> > proton-bridge --cores=1
> 

> 

> Why the use of time-machine?
> 


You're right, i see some pinned version of nonguix and guix into the 
channels.scm of sovereign, so i try to use guix time machine with it, this is 
not the good way it seems.

I add directly your channel in ~/.config/guix/channels.scm this is better :)

But i have another error of hash with the latest `guix pull` version  : 
go-github-com-abiosoft-ishell-2.0.2.drv 


construction de 
/gnu/store/qmawvl4jsbr670y9x17b3w043x7vcb5q-go-github-com-abiosoft-ishell-2.0.2.drv...
construction de /gnu/store/s43q54v98n5l7jvnf844k4npg6crz6aj-git-checkout.drv...
-l'empreinte r:sha256 ne correspond pas pour 
/gnu/store/514zq4lshhnxrqh7z5vw7fx30qcgfy2w-git-checkout :
  empreinte attendue : 057wgbz16n416zp23j5iv2lsd0nidbd92r4f1h8s3c1svkkqvk0a
  empreinte obtenue :  0cmzcq567avzqzrf1ns7lz1gv69s8dxbs276m0j8qbm4yddysqaq


My guix describe : 


  nonguix aff3b00
    URL du dépôt : https://gitlab.com/nonguix/nonguix
    branche : master
    commit : aff3b005f46081cbd111da19e64f8ae07b5b464f
  sovereign 3454a8a
    URL du dépôt : https://git.marekpasnikowski.pl/git/sovereign.git
    branche : master
    commit : 3454a8a025b9b7401cbdf68a6f53515d216e5e98
  guix-science 7bbff91
    URL du dépôt : https://codeberg.org/guix-science/guix-science.git
    branche : master
    commit : 7bbff91a771830003d4349c449d7b3358c7302d1
  guix-android 795f11d
    URL du dépôt : https://framagit.org/tyreunom/guix-android.git
    branche : master
    commit : 795f11d4305bb7ce9a2e79669fe8cb4673a9d0c2
  guix 798f28a
    URL du dépôt : https://git.guix.gnu.org/guix.git
    branche : master
    commit : 798f28ab0d85e05c10ebf8f27cab9f17d3139fce

> I have not looked at the package code for months now, it builds for me 
> perfectly fine all the time, as it is included in one of my systems’.
> The reason why I have not looked is that I have way too many things that I 
> want to do and I got lost in the organizational mess.
> 

> Honestly, I do not even know if it actually works all the way to the intended 
> usability.
> All I know it builds and executes.
> When I ran it just now (with the --cli flag), it even told me that installed 
> a new version.
> How it works with the read-only Guix store is beyond me.
> 

> > Do you have some plan to push your great work to codeberg using pull 
> > request ?
> 

> 

> Thank you for the compliment.
> 

> I am in the process of purchasing a support service with Guixotic.
> One of the questions I intend to ask them is to help me craft a contribution 
> workflow customized to myself.
> When it is complete I will start regularly contributing.

Great news ! During the review / beta test, i will be happy to help if you need 
!

Sebastien R.

Attachment: publickey - [email protected] - 0xC3237850.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to