+1 - that seems like the simplest way of preserving the existing intention.
On 27/08/2016 06:05, Adam Foltzer wrote: > +1 > > Since the HP Minimal fits such a similar niche, perhaps we could adapt > the existing minimal installer language in-place to point to HP Minimal, > rather than removing it. Then we could modify the existing HP section > in-place to clarify that it refers to HP Full. > > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Jason Dagit <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hello all, > > I just realized that the Minimal installer listed first on the > Downloads page (https://www.haskell.org/downloads > <https://www.haskell.org/downloads>) is deprecated and "dead". This > creates an unfortunate situation where our top suggested way to get > haskell immediately tells the user it's dead. > > I think that we should remove mention of the minimal installer ASAP > on the grounds that the HP now comes in minimal and full variants. > > Furthermore, I would like to make the recommendation that we list > the HP above other methods as even the minimal HP installer ships > with stack (at least on windows it does). > > Between the two changes, I think the first one is crucial and the > second one is merely reasonable. > > Thanks, > Jason > > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-community mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-community > <http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-community> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-community mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-community > _______________________________________________ Haskell-community mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-community
