Jacek Generowicz <[email protected]> writes: > Let's say I need an Int -> String. Both > > (fnA2 :: Banana -> String) . (fnA1:: Int -> Banana) > > and > > (fnB2 :: Onion -> String) . (fnB1 :: Int -> Onion) > > will do. So please allow me to store (fnA1, fnA2) and (fnB1, fnB2) in > the same place.
I think you can do this fairly easy with existentials, but.. > The program can tell that it can combine them with (.) ..what else do you want to be able to do with them? (Because, if this is all, you'd just store the combination, no?). -k -- If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
