Daniel Fischer <[email protected]> writes: >> > Knowing about something /= knowing how to use it. I own and have read >> > RWH, but I've never had to use hsc2hs, or Applicative, etc. >> >> Writing libraries that bind to C is a great way to have to use a lot of >> hsc2hs (or c2hs), so clearly you need to contribute more libraries :-) > > dons was replying to *Ivan Miljenovic* here (with a smiley to remove all > doubt), he was teasing [is that the entirely correct word?] Ivan a > bit.
Teasing works (as the teased, I'll accept it anyway :p). As for what Don was teasing me about: lemme first finish writing all these base generic graph libraries, then I'll see about writing bindings to external C libraries for graphs, etc.! >> But in this case, the OP didn't even know *about* the something. > > That, however, is indeed an indicator (not infallible of course). > After a few years of Haskell coding, it's very unlikely that you've never > heard of those tools. Especially if you're active in the community, etc. I mean, it's still possible to not know about hsc2hs, but it gets bandied about every now and again. -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic [email protected] IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
