On Feb 8, 2008, at 11:14 , Stefan Monnier wrote:
You seem to write 12 as 1 :+ 2 instead of () :+ 1 :+ 2. But I
think, the
latter representation should probably be prefered.
(...)
How 'bout treating :+ as similar to `append' rather than similar to
`cons'?
Basically treat :+ as taking 2 numbers (rather than a number and
a digit).
Dumb questions department: why not define e.g. D'0 .. D'9 as () :*
0 .. () :* 9? Programmers then get D'1 :* 2, but the library sees
() :* 1 :* 2.
--
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
