On Feb 7, 2008 11:57 AM, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah, yes, missing parens! Well spotted. > > So a pretty printer wibble in GHC? > > -- Don
Yeah, that was my first concern, but then I noticed the quantification was different, so I'm still working through that one. It was confusing, since I assumed the implementations of :i and :t shared a lot of code. -- Chad _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
