Hello Josef,
Monday, October 29, 2007, 2:08:54 PM, you wrote:
>> that can maybe account for the additional time savings. I'm not sure
>> how to verify that this is the case though.
>>
> Bulat kindly suggested I use +RTS -s to monitor the garbage collectors
> behavior. It seems my hypothesis was right.
you may also look at these data:
1,225,416 bytes allocated in the heap
152,984 bytes copied during GC (scavenged)
8,448 bytes copied during GC (not scavenged)
86,808 bytes maximum residency (1 sample(s))
3 collections in generation 0 ( 0.00s)
1 collections in generation 1 ( 0.00s)
if your hypothesis is true, amount of data copied and number of
generation-1 collection should be much less in the second case
--
Best regards,
Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
