On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 10:40 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yitzchak Gale writes: > > > Dan Piponi wrote: > >> The reusability of Num varies inversely with how many > >> assumptions you make about it. > > > > A default implementation of pi would only increase usability, > > not decrease it. > > Suppose I believe you. (Actually, I am afraid, I have doubts.) > Can you provide some examples of this "increased usability"? > > If possible, with a *relevant* context, which shows that PI should belong > by default to the class Floating (whatever we mean by that...)
pi /is/ a method of class Floating. It just doesn't have a default implementation. jcc _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
