David House wrote:
Andrew Coppin writes:
> > Data.Graph -- graph type
> >
>
> What would you use that for? (And what does it do?)
It's for graphs, in the graph-theory [1] sense.
Yes, I realise that. (I'm not a graph theory expert, but I'm aware of
the subject.) But what kind of thing would you use a general graph for?
(Rather than some more specific custom data type.)
> > Data.Tree -- rose tree type
> >
>
> What's a rose tree? (I only know about binary trees. Well, and N-ary
> trees... but nobody uses those.)
Well, it is said that a rose tree by any other name would be just as N-ary. (I
think they're the same concept :)).
LOL! I asked Wikipedia about "rose tree" and got something quite
different... ;-)
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
