On 12/10/13 20:43, Anthony Cowley wrote:
> I think nub's behavior is rather set-related, so I don't really understand
> the objection to putting it in Data.Set.
In sets, the order does not matter, while for nub it does.
nub :: Eq a => [a] -> [a]
ordNub :: Ord a => [a] -> [a]
both do not mention Set, and the fact that Set is used inside my
proposed ordNub implementation is a detail not visible to the caller.
That's why it looks like a Data.List function to me.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
