fair enough. I take it that you're also (implicitly) committing to maintaining this for the next few years? :)
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Roman Cheplyaka <[email protected]> wrote: > * Andrey Chudnov <[email protected]> [2013-08-05 15:31:16-0400] > > On 08/05/2013 02:48 PM, Roman Cheplyaka wrote: > > >(which is unmaintained). > > Has this been confirmed by the author/maintainer? > > I've sent a couple of emails to Max (one in January, one in April) and > haven't heard anything from him. My patches, which he applied in > January, are still not released. That's why I regard test-framework as > unmaintained. > > You can also make your own impression by browsing github (commit > activity, outstanding pull requests, open issues...) > > > Is it a drop-in replacement for test-framework, e.g. if I substitute > > "test-framework" for "tasty" in my .cabal files, will it work? > > If not, could you provide a quick guide for porting? > > Not quite. > > At the very least, you'll have to change module names > (Test.Framework -> Test.Tasty, > Test.Framework.Providers.HUnit -> Test.Tasty.HUnit, ...), > and wrap the top-level list of tests into a testGroup. > > If you have type signatures, you'll need to rename Test to TestTree. > > That should be enough in most cases. If you use plusTestOptions, you'll > need to look up appropriate functions from Test.Tasty.Options. > > > Also, is the > > current version (0.1) recommended for general use? > > I'd love to see people using it. But you should treat this as beta > software. I am in the process of migrating my own packages to use Tasty. > > Roman > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
