Benjamin Franksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> It's worse: Since according to IEEE +0 is not equal to -0, atan2 is not a
>> function!
>
> Sorry, I meant to write: Since according to IEEE +0 *is* to be regarded as
> equal to -0, atan2 is not a function. (Because it gives different values for
> argument combinations -0, +0.)
>From my point of view it is a function. Only == is not the finest
equality possible (but the one which is more useful).
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk
\__/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
