Tom Pledger writes:

 > This is a pretty good way to stop those nasty vague SQL row types at
 > the Haskell border and turn them into something respectable.  Perhaps
 > it would even be worth constraining the extracted type to be in
 > DeepSeq
 >
 >    doquery :: (DeepSeq v) =>
 >               Process -> String -> IO v -> IO [v]

Can you explain what the constraint does here?

Although I haven't touched the db interface in the meantime, when/if I
do,
I'll probably generalise the query function to do a fold, rathen than
always
accumulate a list:

        doquery :: Process -> String -> (a -> b  -> IO b) -> b -> IO b

Tim
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to