As far a I know sets can implemented by implementing a list of anything(a list of all types) The sets Haskell does have are AFAIK sets of elements of the same type: these are not general sets.
Scott ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ketil Z. Malde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 8:56 AM Subject: Re: Question about sets > "Scott J." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I have a question. Why are sets not implemented in Haskell? > > What do you mean? Isn't > > http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/hslibs/set.html > > sufficient? (Remember to tell GHC '-package data') > > -kzm > -- > If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
