Dear Mr Hosken, Thank you for the reply.
> Unfortunately, the English here is ambiguous. It could be saying > that the immediately preceding glyph is tested and if it is a base, > then attachment occurs ... Do you mean that the point of this item is the interpretation of 'preceding'? > But I would suggest that if this sentence could be rewritten without > using the word 'preceding', then things would be a lot clearer. OK, I understand that it is your (= developer's) interpretation of the specification. I feel it convincing too. Thank you, -- Shusaku KIMURA [email protected] _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
