On 14-04-14 12:20 AM, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > Behdad, > > > I guess I've found a bug in `hb_ot_layout_lookup_collect_glyphs'. In > FreeType's `src/autofit/hbshim.c', I'm calling it like this: > > hb_ot_layout_collect_lookups( face, > HB_OT_TAG_GSUB, > script_tags, > NULL, > coverage_tags, > gsub_lookups ); > > Testing it with `lohit_hi.ttf' (version 2.4.1), it returns the > following lookup indices for the `deva' script: > > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 > 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 > 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 > 72 73 74 80 83 > > However, there are more GSUB lookups, referenced via chained context > lookups, AFAICS. Example: lookup 76, which gets referenced in > lookup 4. > > I presume that this is not intentional behaviour.
It *is* intentional behavior. What's your exact use case? behdad > > Werner > _______________________________________________ > HarfBuzz mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz > -- behdad http://behdad.org/ _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
