On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 04:21:12PM -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > Are you shaping at upem size?
That is just the output of hb-shape, so I guess yes. > If Uniscribe returns the old value then this is definitely a bug. Seems so: $ cat test | hb-shape.exe amiri-regular.ttf --shapers=uniscribe [uni06DD=0+2620|one.small=1@-2210,0+0|two.small=2@-1610,0+0|three.small=3@-1010,0+0] $ cat test | hb-shape.exe amiri-regular.ttf --shapers=ot [uni06DD=0+2620|one.small=1@-2209,0+1|two.small=2@-1609,0+1|three.small=3@-1009,0+1] > Feel free to suggest a patch. Or we can just revert. I’m not sure I understand the math behind that commit, so I can’t suggest a fix. > BTW, is Amiri still on SF, or github? If it's on github, may be a good idea > to set it up on travis-ci.org, then add a hook from harfbuzz github to trigger > amiri tests on travis, and send failure reports to harfbuzz list. There is a github mirror, that would be nice if it can be done, but I need to check how to setup travis. Regards, Khaled _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
