On 04/11/2012 09:11 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote: > > 2) I think the ligature code _should_ skip marks, so that a sequence such as > <lam, fatha, alef> will still find the lam-alef ligature (and leave the fatha > after it - which loses the distinction between this and <lam, alef, fatha>, > but it's better than breaking the ligature).
Ok, I'll try to copy the logic from GSUB then. Ie. using GDEF. That would rely on I fixing synthetic GDEF first though. If we attach lig_id and component numbers, the fallback mark positioning layer can in fact then try to position the mark in the right ligature component. Fixed the rest. behdad _______________________________________________ HarfBuzz mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/harfbuzz
