-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said:
|> Still one part of what Joerg has been talking about he characterized as |> different component selection so it was more robust, that sounds fine if |> it is not adding expense / size. | Though you were bitching at it from very beginning, and it never would have This is the second time we have a thread where you are seem to me to be basically sulking you are not getting automatic signoff on what you want to apply to the hardware design. Isn't once enough on internal list? I made my points about it, if you have some analysis of dead GTA02s to drive this then I am listening. If someone in .tw is already convinced by your use of "bitching" repeatedly, they can just take it on by their own decision. But of all the crap we have to worry about on GTA03... making up new worries like polarity reversal protection... - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAki31zQACgkQOjLpvpq7dMotQACgkpVv7Tolr6ZIm4sH3cujHf/8 cpYAnR3ikDrLmFYDzTS51dTXfJGOkO19 =t8g9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ hardware mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/hardware
