Gotta be age. (Which to some degree, supposedly corresponds to size)
Yours in cosutming,Lisa A On Mon, 23 Jan 2012 05:41:09 -0500 <penn...@costumegallery.com> writes: > I am working on an article about 1968 boys wear from a clothing > industry > trade journal. Repeatedly in the article refers to boys wear 3-7. > The > article doesn't state if this is ages or sizes. Below is a little > from the > article: > > > > "For more years than they like to remember, the bane of the > existence of 3-7 > makers was price. It reached a certain point.and then stayed there. > Then > along came the family revolution in men's wear.and the boys' wear > people > jumped right into the fray. Even 3-7 houses, in their own separate > world, > couldn't stand idly by." > > > > What do you think? Age or size? > > > > Penny Ladnier, owner > > The Costume Gallery Websites > > <http://www.costumegallery.com/> www.costumegallery.com > > 15 websites of fashion, costume, and textile history > > FaceBook: > <http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Costume-Gallery-Websites/1074984159615 79> > http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Costume-Gallery-Websites/10749841596157 9 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > h-costume mailing list > h-costume@mail.indra.com > http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume > _______________________________________________ h-costume mailing list h-costume@mail.indra.com http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
