On Wed, Apr 1, 2026 at 12:31 PM Gabriel Wicki <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi! > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 09:48:35AM -0400, Greg Hogan wrote: > > It isn't just the GCD process, our GNU Guix community is high-trust. > > Much of the novelty in GCD007 seems to be an attempt to prevent > > low-trust actions. The counter-proposal here is to carry on since we > > have yet to see identified any issues fixed or mitigated by this > > proposal. > I am not sure I understand. Could you explain what you mean by > high-trust, low-trust and how GCD007 would change these things? > > Have a splendid day! > gabriel / gabber
I still have not yet seen stated what issues or deficiencies this proposal is attempting to resolve. We have the what but not the why. If you feel that the documentation can be improved or clarified, you can and should submit a simple patch. This is not a well written GCD, and the reply will be that everyone should help fix the issues, but it is on the author to frame the topic under discussion. Why make everything a team, but then distinguish special teams? Why when "serious issues emerge, the maintainer's collective can be (partially) replaced by a GCD" when maintainers can singularly disapprove that GCD? That is high-trust to low-trust. Greg
