Adding John Cowan, author of SRFI 235. On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 7:01 AM Rutger van Beusekom < [email protected]> wrote:
> I propose to change the current meaning and the implementation of both > conjoin and disjoin in srfi-235 to the ones here below: > Thank you for your detailed and thoughtful report. Alas, once a SRFI has been finalized, its definition can't be changed. The official way to redefine something like that is to publish a new SRFI with the changed definition. That way, there's no confusion about which definition is being used. If you or someone else would like to do that, I'd be happy to shepherd the new SRFI along. I'm hoping that John will chime in, too.
