Hi, Just would like to follow up on our previous conversation. The libgda master CI was broken and finally got fixed recently. All test and compilation should be ok. I tried to compile libgdamm and do see some issues due to last-two-years activity in libgda. It may be a good idea to setup a CI for libgdamm. I will try to play with that. Let me know if you have a specific plan to move forward.
Best, -Pavlo. On Thu, 2020-01-23 at 16:20 +0100, murr...@murrayc.com wrote: > Your help would be much appreciated. Actually, I had difficulty even > building libgda. > > On 23 Jan 2020 15:25, Pavlo Solntsev via gtkmm-list < > gtkmm-list@gnome.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I saw some recent activities in libgdamm repo. However, I checked > > and > > it looks like the library can't be compiled because of changes in > > libgda code. Would it be be possible to open issues for work that > > needs > > to be done? I can help with porting some code. For now, I am > > cleaning > > documentation for lilbgda and found that some API introduced in the > > dev > > version (6.0) can be obsolete. Technically, this is not obsolete, > > since > > we didn't have a stable version yet. For instance, a lot of DDL > > operations were moved to the new GdaDB... module and having > > redundant > > API is not the best approach. Anyway, I would like to coordinate > > work > > on libgdamm if possible. Thanks. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gtkmm-list mailing list > > gtkmm-list@gnome.org > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list > > > > _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
