On 7 October 2017 at 17:56, Daniel Boles <dboles....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is that leaking references to the C instance, or what did I miss? > And the whole C++ instance itself, it would seem. After really thinking about this, I feel like I must've missed something obvious, and glibmm must keep a lazily initialised dictionary of wrapped widgets to free later, or something. :) But I suspect tracking down the relevant code is still beyond my current level of skill. I guess for now I'll do what gtkmm does: just use the pointer and don't mess with its lifetime, and hopefully find out what that's OK later!
_______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
