On Wed, 2017-07-26 at 09:52 +0100, Daniel Boles wrote: > Well, yeah, it's a way, in that usually you can use a set() method > with its argument being suitably-typed equivalent of 'empty' or > 'null' to achieve unsetting.
I don't think we can generally assume that that works as expected. > However, in many or perhaps most cases, there is an unset() to make > things simpler, and IMO that is better API and should be offered/used > where possible. Yes, the unset_*() methods are more obvious. We just need to mention them in the documentation. -- Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
