On 28 June 2017 at 10:51, Daniel Boles <dboles....@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, I thought about that briefly but forgot by the time I was writing > the email. I wonder whether sigc::trackable can help here, although maybe > that's getting too complex to be worthwhile. >
In fact, that definitely sounds too complex for what we'd gain. We would do better just to tell users to be careful with lifetimes, as they must already do in various other places, than to impose a new base class on ustring.
_______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
