On Mon, 2017-05-29 at 19:22 +0100, Daniel Boles wrote: > On 29 May 2017 at 15:32, Murray Cumming <murr...@murrayc.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 22:11 +0100, Daniel Boles wrote: > > > There are a few uses of the GLib typedef gsize in glibmm et al. > > > > > > I presume it would be safe to provide an M4 conversion from this > > to > > > std::size_t? Do you think that would be good? To me, it seems > > nicer > > > to use the C++ standard type. > > > > Yes, that sounds good. Thanks. > > > Thanks for the confirmation. Does the same apply to other g* types, > both the generic ones (guchar, guint, etc.) and the specific-width > ones (guint8 to std::uint8_t, etc.) ?
Personally, I like the brevity of guint compared to unsigned int, or even std::uint32_t. But I could maybe be persuaded. Replacing guint8 with std::uint8_t sounds reasonable, though I doubt there are many of the min the API anyway. I guess we could replace many of the 'guchar's with std::byte in C++17. -- Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
