On 4 April 2017 at 14:52, Murray Cumming wrote: > Any ideas about how we should support C++17 in gtkmm-3.0 without losing > C++11/14 compatibility and without breaking ABI?
Replace all dynamic exception specifications with noexcept(false) (or just no exception specification). That's not an ABI change. > Or should we require C++17 for later gtkmm-3.0 versions? I think that would be premature, GCC support for it is still experimental. > Noticed here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438766 _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
