Den 2016-08-09 kl. 19:28, skrev Kjell Ahlstedt:
Den 2016-08-05 kl. 09:45, skrev Murray Cumming:
Maybe we could just remove any sentence that includes "g_free". We
might lose a little information that happens to be in the same
sentence, but I guess it would be worth it.
That's a good idea. I'll test it to see what it would do to the
documentation of glibmm and gtkmm.
Kjell
I have pushed the patch "gmmproc: Add
DocsParser::remove_c_memory_handling_info()"
https://git.gnome.org/browse/glibmm/commit/?id=1ced6f1a720828122b5c8e7d136c8e93f1fb05ea
It behaves reasonably well when building glibmm and gtkmm.
It makes one description of a return value in gtkmm worse
(Gtk::Clipboard::wait_for_uris()). I've fixed that with a hand-coded
description in clipboard.hg.
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gtkmm/commit/?id=4b020269c3fc8187a666fa67226e8aac8881c035
It removes at least one sentence that ought not to be removed (in
Gio::ApplicationCommandLine::get_arguments()). That method returns a
char**, like g_application_command_line_get_arguments(). It can also be
fixed with a hand-coded description, but I've not done that (yet). That
description contains other problematic text as well. It refers to
g_option_context_parse_strv(), which is not wrapped in Glib::OptionContext.
Kjell
_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
gtkmm-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
