On Do, 2016-07-28 at 09:59 +0200, Kjell Ahlstedt wrote: > There is an open gtkmm bug that actually concerns libgnomedbmm, https > ://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768819 > That made me wonder about the status of both libglademm and > libgnomedbmm. > Both libglade, libglademm, libgnomedb and libgnomedbmm are listed as > products in Bugzilla, but with different classification. > libglade: Deprecated > libglademm: Otherlibgnomedb: Deprecated > libgnomedbmm: Other > The deprecated products are found only on Bugzilla's search page. > > Should libglademm and libgnomedbmm also be classified as deprecated?
Yes. libglademm is replaced by Gtk::Builder. libgnomedbmm is replaced by libgdamm. > I know that libglademm has been superseded by Gtk::Builder. > I don't know much about libgnomedbmm. Is it correct that > libgnomedb(mm) is a GUI for libga(mm)? Recent versions of libgda > contain GUI classes like GdauiGrid and GdauiForm. It looks like > libgnomedb has become a part of libgda. Has libgnomedbmm been > superseded by libgda-uimm? > > When I built libgdamm and libgda-uimm from the latest code in the git > repository, I noticed that both libgdamm and libgda-uimm needed some > fixes in order to build. They have not kept up with the latest > changes in libgda. Would it be a good idea for me to update them? I wouldn't waste time on them, if I was you. -- Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
