On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 14:59 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 07/02/2015 10:31 AM, Murray Cumming wrote: > > Does anyone object to us requiring C++11 as long as we don't break ABI? > > There's a reasonable chance that this won't break ABI. > > How does this play with gtkmm 2.4? If glibmm now requires C++11, does it > mean that gtkmm 2.4 and legacy apps that are still on gtkmm 2.4 need to > be built with std=c++11 as well?
Yes, if that's possible. I'd accept patches to fix C++11 build problems in gtkmm 2.4, if you find any. But really, people should stop using gtkmm 2.4. -- Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
