On Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:03:04 +0200 Kalev Lember <kalevlem...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 06/29/2015 08:18 AM, Murray Cumming wrote: > > On Sun, 2015-06-28 at 20:30 +0100, Chris Vine wrote: > >> On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 20:17:28 +0200 > >> Murray Cumming <murr...@murrayc.com> wrote: > >>> Given that --std=c+11 breaks ABI compatibility (at least in the > >>> standard library), I wonder if/when distros would ever build > >>> glibmm with C++11 support. > >> > >> gcc-3.4 and gcc-4.* do not provide libstdc++ with a C++11 > >> compliant ABI (this is mainly concerned with gcc's copy on write > >> string implementation) and gcc-5.1 does by default do so, > > [snip] > > > > So do you think any apps have been built with C++11 on mainstream > > distros so far? > > All of Fedora 23 (scheduled for release this October / November) is > built with the new C++11 ABI.
True, but this is orthogonal to the question whether distributions ship programs "built with C++11", from which I took Murray to mean which use C++11 features and are compiled with the -std=c++0x or -std=c++11 flags. Fedora 22 also ships with programs "built with C++11", including firefox. Quite probably fedora 21 does so too. The new C++ ABI covers any C++ program, C++98 or C++11 or whatever, which uses a version of libstdc++ compiled for the new ABI. The old C++ ABI covers any C++ program, C++98 or C++11 or whatever, which uses a version of libstdc++ compiled for the old ABI. Chris _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
