On 24 June 2015 at 13:04, Krzesimir Nowak <qdl...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2015-06-24 9:27 GMT+02:00 Murray Cumming <murr...@murrayc.com>: >> On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 15:29 +0200, Krzesimir Nowak wrote: >>> 2015-05-06 21:44 GMT+02:00 Murray Cumming <murr...@murrayc.com>: >>> > Yet this page still says >>> > "Important: GCC's support for C++11 is still experimental." >>> > https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html >>> > >>> > However, the following sentence suggest that the page might be out >>> of >>> > date, given that the final C++11 standard has happened: "Some >>> features >>> > were implemented based on early proposals, and no attempt will be >>> made >>> > to maintain backward compatibility when they are updated to match >>> the >>> > final C++11 standard." >>> > >>> > On the other hand, that page still seems to be the official place to >>> > find out about g++'s C++1 support. So I remain confused. >>> > >>> > >>> >>> I asked on gcc mailing list about it - gcc folks want to have C++11 as >>> a default dialect in gcc 6, so I suppose that C++11 has full support >>> already. Maybe my question will prod them to update the gcc manual >>> about supported language standards. >>> >>> Please see https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2015-05/msg00075.html. >> >> I don't see any reply to your question. So I'm still stuck with wanting >> to use C++11 but having a big official warning telling me not to. > > I probably joined this mailing list thread a bit too late for anyone > to pay attention. But I asked about this on #gcc channel and they told > me that c++11 is officially supported in gcc5, but the manual is > outdated. But well, that's IRC - there are no official logs containing > my question, no pics, it didn't happen.
The https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html page details in which GCC version various C++11 features were implemented. The final language bits of C++11 were implemented in GCC 4.8.1. See also https://isocpp.org/blog/2013/05/gcc-4.8.1-released-c11-feature-complete and the corresponding release announcement at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-announce/2013/msg00004.html. The https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx1y.html page is the equivalent for C++14, where the language features are fully implemented in GCC 5. The library support is dependent on libstdc++, but I don't know where support for this is tracked relative to libstdc++ releases (there is one tracking the latest subversion code). HTH, - Reece H. Dunn > I can only paste a fragment > from the channel (where "jakub" is Jakub Jelínek, one of gcc > maintainers): > > Irfy: he feels the support is still too experimental and not yet > real-world tested enough > krnowak: Irfy: Documentation is still saying that c++11 is > experimental in gcc 5.1. > Irfy: really? i thought i came across the wording "full support for > c++11" in the release notes? > Irfy: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/changes.html but under 'Runtime > Library (libstdc++)" > krnowak: Irfy: > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-5.1.0/gcc/Standards.html#Standards > and to go point 2.2 (C++ language). > krnowak: It's probably outdated, dunno. > krnowak: As it doesn't mention C++14 at all. > jakub: c++11 is not experimental in gcc 5.1, indeed, that Standards > section of the docs is outdated > >> >> -- >> Murray Cumming >> murr...@murrayc.com >> www.murrayc.com >> >> > _______________________________________________ > gtkmm-list mailing list > gtkmm-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
