Thanks a lot for your time, Kjell... After this, I decided to rebuild all my Linux system... and the problems about 'pangocairo' disapeared; but no at all in building the last g*mm releases, because the process broke at 'gtk+' step, as shown below,
[...] checking Pango flags... -pthread -I/opt/gnome/include/pango-1.0 -I/opt/gnome/include/glib-2.0 -I/opt/gnome/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/opt/gnome/include/harfbuzz -I/usr/local/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/cairo -I/usr/local/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -L/opt/gnome/lib -L/usr/local/lib -lpangocairo-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lcairo -lgobject-2.0 -lglib-2.0 checking for cairo_surface_set_device_scale... no checking for GDK_DEP... yes checking for ATK... no configure: error: Package requirements (atk atk-bridge-2.0) were not met: No package 'atk-bridge-2.0' found [...] This seems strange too, because 'ATk' and 'ATkmm' packages are already builded (& installed). What should be happen ? Glus 2014-03-22 12:09 GMT+01:00 Kjell Ahlstedt <kjell.ahlst...@bredband.net>: > I have just used jhbuild to build the latest version of gtkmm. No > problems! > > You showed in > https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtkmm-list/2014-March/msg00022.html that > your jhbuildrc file contains > > modules = [ 'librsvg', 'glibmm', 'gtkmm' ] > > The command 'jhbuild list gtkmm' does not list librsvg. I don't think you > have problems building gtkmm, you have problems building librsvg. But it is > strange. pangocairo is part of pango, and 'jhbuild list librsvg' shows that > jhbuild shall build pango before it builds librsvg. > > Kjell > > 2014-03-21 11:42, Glus Xof skrev: > > Hi guys, > > As mentioned yesterday, it's not possible yet (almost to me...) to build > from scratch gtkmm libraries using jhbuild, while the process breaks on > trying to configure librsvg. > > The question seems to be that it needs one newer version of 'pangocairo', > and I guess that this should be provided correctly by the system. > > Forgive me if you are not the suitable list, but I don't know who is the > responsible of solving this inconsistence. > > Meanwhile... I'd like to ask you for the work around, if anyone can > suggest anything... > > Cheers, > > Glus > > >
_______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
