> On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 00:35 +0100, Bo Lorentsen wrote: > [snip] > > The gain from this model would be better performance (not a lot of > > unused virtual function), and lower memory footprint (no or very > > small vtables).
I frankly don't see a problem here. I'm only aware of one problem: Gtkmm binaries (esp. with debug information) are _large_. However, I'm not sure if it is a problem with Gtkmm, libsigc++ or just with C++ itself. >From my experience, you shouldn't bother that GUI-related code is slow, it is usually fast enough anyway, even if it can be rewritten to be more efficient (but usually less clear and simple.) Paul _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
