Hello Wolfgang,
> "   *  Routes carried by BGP MUST NOT carry RPKI validation states in
>       transitive BGP path attributes
>       [I-D.ietf-sidrops-avoid-rpki-state-in-bgp]."
> 
> is "MUST NOT" a bit too strong here?
> That would forbid to set a BGP Community reflecting the outcome of an
> RPKI check, which is current practice for example for our (DE-CIX)
> route servers.

Ah, thanks; While that practice SHOULD of course be changed (;-)), the
referenced document that just passed WGLC in SIDROPS also says SHOULD.
I aligned the BCP14 language.

> Otherwise the document is fine.

Good to hear, thanks!

With best regards,
Tobias

-- 
Univ.Prof. Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig
T +31 616 80 98 99
M [email protected]

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to