> On Mar 16, 2026, at 05:09, <[email protected]> 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Dear Jeff,
>  
> This means if there are any lingering issues that must be addressed before 
> publication that they're on the must-fix list.
>  
> Great. Could you please answer the second question in slide 17 of 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/125/materials/slides-125-grow-bmp-yang-model-for-network-telemetry-messages

I have avoided answering this intentionally because I do not speak for all of 
the authors.

*I* think we should fix this.

> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-model states that the model supports ipv4-unicast and ipv6-
> unicast address-families and defers the remaining AFI/SAFI to other or future
> drafts. draft-netana-nmop-message-broker-bmp-telemetry-msg authors intend
> to cover l3vpn-ipv4-unicast, l3vpn-ipv6-unicast, l2vpn-evpn and ipv4-labeled-
> unicast for covering operational BGP RIB. The current understanding is that 
> this
> has not been addressed at the IETF yet correct?

Mahesh and I did "stress testing" of the model to prove that we an add those 
additional families in the future.  

That work will need to be done.



>  
> In your case, we see the unit test was "broken" since this example module 
> only worked because it was in the BGP namespace
>  
> Unclear what you mean with that. The YANG schema tree of 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-netana-nmop-message-broker-bmp-telemetry-msg-02
>   defined YANG modules were validated with yanglint 5.0.6. We are able to 
> generate the YANG schema tree and validate example message against schema.
>  
> You find here the yang modules, YANG library, generated YANG schema tree and 
> example messages used for validating with yanglint.
>  
> https://github.com/network-analytics/draft-netana-nmop-message-broker-bmp-telemetry-message/tree/main/examples
> https://github.com/network-analytics/draft-netana-nmop-message-broker-bmp-telemetry-message/tree/main/yang

I have been struggling for time to play with this.  My reading has been that if 
we convert the submodules into modules, all is well - or have I misunderstood 
this entire time?

-- Jeff

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to