Hi Karl & Hilmar, At 2026-04-13T00:39:42-0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > ...I can add a sentence to the discussion of `\f` escape sequences > like the following. > > \fB, \fI, \fR, \fP > ... > Only the escape sequences shown are dependable. > Others, such as \fC, are not portable, meaningless on > terminal devices, and can prompt warnings from GNU > troff(1). > > ...something like that, maybe? `\fC` is worth calling out > specifically since it's shockingly popular for a specimen of > ineffectual syntax.
I've committed a change similar to this to groff Git. You can expect it in the next groff release, tentatively scheduled for early July. Regards, Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
