"G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robin...@gmail.com> writes:

> No--if you mean the two examples I think you do, I was illustrating how
> things go wrong if the amount of supplemental inter-sentence space is
> _not_ the formatter-plus-English-"groff locale"'s default.

Ah! Thank you, now I think I understand.

The thing that I had misunderstood was that I thought the change would
cause groff to force the spacing after " to the intersentence spacing, and
what I am understanding now is that the change would cause groff to
preserve the existing spacing after " instead of adjusting it to the
intersentence spacing. Do I now have this correct?

If that's the case, then I'm less concerned about that change since it
sticks a bit closer to the spacing on the input. I think the main place
where it might result in unwanted output is the case where regular text
ends with `."` at the end of a line. Currently, when reflowing that text,
I believe nroff would add two spaces after `."`, and I think under your
proposal it would instead add one space, and thus would be inconsistent
with the default intersentence spacing?

-- 
Russ Allbery (ea...@eyrie.org)             <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Reply via email to