At 2025-04-21T19:08:25-0500, Dave Kemper wrote: > FWIW, in case you want to update the ChangeLog entry, I also > encountered this failure on gcc 9.3.0. (This commit showed up just as > I was about to submit a bug report.)
Thanks, Dave. No idea why it didn't fail for me using GCC 10.2.1 and a pile of what I thought were paranoid compiler options.[1] "The issue's not whether you're paranoid, Lenny...the issue is whether you're paranoid _enough_." Regards, Branden [1] COMMON_FLAGS="-Wall -Wextra -Wformat=2 \ -Wformat-overflow \ -Walloc-zero \ -Wstringop-overflow=4 \ -Wshadow=global -Wredundant-decls \ -Wunused \ -Wunused-parameter \ -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow \ -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error \ -fstack-protector-strong -fno-common \ -fstack-clash-protection \ -ftrapv \ -funsigned-char \ -fvar-tracking-assignments \ -flto=auto \ -O0 -Og \ -ggdb -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2" CFLAGS="$COMMON_FLAGS \ -Wmissing-prototypes \ -Wold-style-definition \ -Wstrict-prototypes \ -Wold-style-declaration \ -Wformat=2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2" CXXFLAGS="$COMMON_FLAGS \ -fcheck-new \ -Wredundant-decls \ -std=c++98 -pedantic -pedantic-errors -Wformat=2 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2" export CFLAGS CXXFLAGS
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
