Link: <https://lwn.net/Articles/989380/>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jo...@kernel.org>
Cc: Günther Noack <gno...@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar <a...@kernel.org>
---

[offlist]

Hi Günther, Jiri,

I've prepared a draft of this contributing process that we talked about.
I won't officially post it until the other situation (sponsoring) is
resolved, but we can discuss it in private if you want.


Have a lovely night!
Alex

 CONTRIBUTING.d/patches | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)

diff --git a/CONTRIBUTING.d/patches b/CONTRIBUTING.d/patches
index fedb163d3..0562ded66 100644
--- a/CONTRIBUTING.d/patches
+++ b/CONTRIBUTING.d/patches
@@ -131,6 +131,26 @@ Description
        to the list.  See also <CONTRIBUTING.d/git> for instructions for
        configuring git-send-email(1) to use neomutt(1) as a driver.
 
+   New kernel/libc features
+       If you write a new kernel or libc feature, you should document it
+       in the same patch set that adds the feature, including any
+       patches to the manual pages.  The entire patch set consisting of
+       both the feature and its manual page should be sent to all
+       recipients for a better review process.  That can be done with
+       the following procedure:
+
+       1)  Generate the kernel or libc patch set, with a cover letter,
+           and using --thread in git-format-patch(1) (as specified in
+           our ./CONTRIBUTING.d/git).  This will generate a Message-ID
+           header field in the cover letter.
+
+       2)  Generate the man-pages patch set using
+           --in-reply-to="<message-id>", where <message-id> is the value
+           of the header field of the cover letter.
+
+       3)  Send first the kernel/libc patch set, and then the man-pages
+           one, so that they have a consistent order.
+
 See also
        CONTRIBUTING
        CONTRIBUTING.d/*
-- 
2.39.2

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to