Follow-up Comment #2, bug #64575 (project groff):
[comment #1 comment #1:]
> I must have mistakenly thought that `PY` would call _mm_'s
> `PF`, but experimentation reveals that this is not the case.
I hadn't even considered the possibility--and if I had, probably would have
left pic.tmac as-is rather than testing the various permutations, for fear of
missing some edge case. So you're three steps ahead of me again.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64575>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
