FWIW,
I noticed that
"ang"
which is groff's \(/_ has a certain line thickness.
However,
"rang"
which is constructed from "|" and \(ru is much thinner, almost half of "ang"
If I made it "fat", its lines are about the same thickness as those of "ang".
My 2c.
Or maybe I need glasses - Damian
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eqnchar Damian McGuckin
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eqnchar Damian McGuckin
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eqnchar Damian McGuckin
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eqnchar G. Branden Robinson
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eqnchar Damian McGuckin
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eqnchar Damian McGuckin
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eqncha... G. Branden Robinson
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eq... Damian McGuckin
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eq... Damian McGuckin
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eq... Damian McGuckin
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eq... Damian McGuckin
- Re: [TUHS] Re: symbols in eq... Damian McGuckin
