> Peter will probably have a more elegant (and likely more correct) > solution, but this may work for you: > > Replace the “\&.” with “\h'-\w' 'u'.”. This worked for me in the one > experiment that I tried. > > --Dale Dale,
Thank you for pointing me in the direction that you did. I learned a lot by parsing your suggestion. I found that your approach worked for my simple test cases, but then failed for the real case. I think the reason is that, in my real case of fully justified text, the width of single space between words is not constant. So, for my real case, I ended up needing two spaces as the argument for "\w'" instead of a single space. That two-space change gets my text looking pretty good, so long as I don't change the words around the underscored words. Thank you again. -- Steve Ross
