Hi Ingo, At 2022-08-27T12:49:05+0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote: > There remains a regression in man(7) .EX/.EE which i will report ASAP.
If it's this one, I already pushed a fix days ago.
commit f287bb7243a7d77e8b4f3a432d00c6f0681b687d
Author: G. Branden Robinson <g.branden.robin...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue Aug 23 12:56:02 2022 -0500
[man]: Restore robustness to `EE` misuse.
* tmac/an.tmac: Add `an*is-in-example` register to keep track state of
within-exampleness. Not doing so can cause a spurious use of `EE` to
wrongly set the inter-paragraph distance to zero.
(TH): Initialize register.
(EX): Test register; if set, ignore macro call and, if `CHECKSTYLE`
warnings are on, throw diagnostic. Set register.
(EE): Test register; if clear, ignore macro call and, if `CHECKSTYLE`
warnings are on, throw diagnostic. Clear register.
* tmac/an-ext.tmac (EX, EE): Similar, using `mX` register. Because AT&T
troff had no `return` request, invert the sense of the tests and put
the entire macro bodies inside conditionals.
This regressed post-1.22.4. Thanks to Ingo Schwarze for the report and
a proposed patch.
Regards,
Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
