Hi Branden, Doug wrote: > > Doing it for groff-related man pages only would simply brand groff > > as quirky. ... > And, as I shall never cease to remind people, the man(7) `PT` and `BT` > traps are replaceable, thanks to the efforts of Larry Kollar around 20 > years ago.
Are you saying a man-page author should work around groff's increasing deviancy by adding code to replace those two traps if it's being formatted by groff? -- Cheers, Ralph.