> I propose a radical solution to the problem of defining \&: return > to the cstr54 definition,
Hear! Hear! > if we must find a convenient, shorter alternative, "null > character" seems the best choice, You must be joking. That would be a gratuitous clash in terminology for a large fraction of groff users. Everybody who's ever written a C program knows that the null character is ASCII NUL, the terminator of string objects, Doug
