On 6/4/22, James K. Lowden <jklow...@schemamania.org> wrote: > A "zero width space" is perfectly clear terminology.
Not to anyone familiar with Unicode's U+200B ZERO WIDTH SPACE, which doesn't correspond to groff's \& but to its \: (which groff currently calls the "non-printing break point"). And regardless of who can claim the longer history, Unicode terminology is in much wider use today than CSTR#54 terminology.
