On 29/09/2020 16:27, James K. Lowden wrote: > That would work, but IMO wouldn't be very convenient. I was thinking > along the lines of > > .SH id=foo class=bar > Your title here
That would conflict with groff's existing SH usage; from groff_ms(7): > .SH [xx] > Unnumbered subheading. The use of the optional xx argument is > a GNU extension, which adjusts the point size of the unnumbered > subheading to match that of a numbered heading, introduced > using .NH xx with the same value of xx. -- Regards, Keith.
