On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 09:18:56AM -0500, Dave Kemper wrote:
> Subject: Re: \: re-enables hyphenation--should it?
>
> I'd mildly prefer to see \:'s hyphenation-reset behavior changed. \%
> changes meaning depending on whether it's at the start or in the
> middle of a word, and your examples illustrate that it's acting with
> its beginning-of-word meaning when it follows a midword \:, which also
> seems incongruous (though necessary if the \: resetting behavior is
> retained).
Doesn't this depend on the definition of a word boundary? I'm not
familiar with groff internals, but thinking about the fact that a
word boundary has two modes in vi(1), for example (normally a word
being a sequence of alpha-numeric or "_" characters;
alternatively being a sequence of anything other than white
space), perhaps a word is defined differently in groff depending
on circumstances? A URL quite possibly breaks assumptions about
words that might be rooted in the early 1970s.
-- Steve
--
Steve Izma
-
Home: 35 Locust St., Kitchener, Ontario, Canada N2H 1W6
E-mail: si...@golden.net phone: 519-745-1313
cell (text only; not frequently checked): 519-998-2684
==
I have always felt the necessity to verify what to many seemed a
simple multiplication table.
-- Ilya Ehrenburg (Soviet author and critic; he's not
talking about mathematics)
